首页> 外文OA文献 >What Do Patrons Really Do in Music Libraries? An Ethnographic Approach to Improving Library Services
【2h】

What Do Patrons Really Do in Music Libraries? An Ethnographic Approach to Improving Library Services

机译:赞助人在音乐图书馆中实际上能做什么?以人种学方法改善图书馆服务

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Improving services is what librarians are all about. Of course, doing that requires them to first determine what needs improving, a process that typically involves activities such as number-gathering (e.g., circulation statistics and gate counts), face-to-face patron interviews, surveys, and observation, all of which individually have shortcomings. If the source of the data is reliable, number-gathering is a highly-accurate evaluation method. Unfortunately, this method cannot be used to address all inquiries, and it lacks the human element that brings life to research. Face-to-face interviews and surveys may introduce the human element, but can be misleading because people often say one thing and do another. Likewise, observation introduces the human element, but it does so in a limited way when carried out in the traditional fashion, which centers on defining the behaviors on which observers will focus their attention (Zweizig 1996, 118). Doing this, however, means that any number of other behaviors, knowledge of which could prove useful to improving services, will be ignored. Though admittedly more challenging and time consuming, adopting an ethnographic approach to evaluating library services results in a more complete and accurate picture than is possible with traditional library evaluation methods.
机译:改善服务是图书馆员的全部宗旨。当然,这样做需要他们首先确定需要改进的地方,这个过程通常涉及诸如数字收集(例如,流通统计和登机口计数),面对面顾客访问,调查和观察等活动,所有这些各自都有缺点。如果数据源可靠,则数字收集是一种非常准确的评估方法。不幸的是,这种方法不能用于解决所有询问,并且缺少使研究变得生动的人为因素。面对面的访谈和调查可能会引入人为因素,但可能会产生误导,因为人们经常说一件事,而另一件事。同样,观察引入了人为因素,但是当以传统方式进行观察时,它以有限的方式这样做,集中于定义观察者将注意力集中在其上的行为(Zweizig 1996,118)。但是,这样做意味着将忽略许多其他行为,这些行为的知识可能对改善服务有用。尽管公认的是更具挑战性和耗时的工作,但采用人种学方法评估图书馆服务的结果却比传统图书馆评估方法更完整,更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号